Tokynd Security puts AI security colleagues inside the tools your developers and infrastructure teams already use. They review agent code, MCP, prompts and RAG, baseline runtime behavior, propose merge-ready patches, verify the rescan, and turn each approved fix into evidence — end to end across the AI-SDLC.
MCP tool granted write scope it never uses
The crm-lookup server holds crm.records.write and crm.records.delete, but the agent only calls read paths. Reachability analysis confirms no write call in 90 days of traces. Combined with an unvalidated prompt template, a single injected instruction could delete customer records.
Patch approved — local patch approved; simulated merge event recorded — no repository contacted.
Identity re-issued — long-lived key retired; scoped 15-minute token provisioned by Tokynd Birthright.
Finding re-verified — Wiz re-queried: exposure closed. Evidence written back to Wiz and your ticket.
Control evidence logged — SOC 2 CC6.1 / ISO 42001 A.6 evidence pack updated automatically.
Agents now take consequential actions in real systems. The security model has to govern the identity making the move, the path it takes, and the fix that follows — without turning innovation into another ticket queue.
Agents move money, touch PII, call production tools, and change systems. Every non-human identity is a token; without a named owner, scoped permissions, expiry, and a kill switch, that token is governed too late.
Direct and indirect injection, tool-description poisoning, MCP overreach, and noisy alert floods are already part of the operating model. Visibility matters; a governed response matters more.
Tokynd Security closes both through the Tokynd platform: Tokynd Birthright at creation, then see → fix → govern → prove across every action.
A model can seem harmless. Its answer can read clean. Neither tells you whether the agent should have acted. Harm happens earlier — in the decision, the moment the agent weighs what it can reach against what it is trying to do, and moves. That moment fails in three distinct ways.
The action is taken by a token nobody owns — a service key from three years ago, an agent nobody registered. No owner to approve, no expiry to enforce, no switch to kill.
Governed by Tokynd Birthright — identity at creation.
The identity is legitimate but holds scope it never uses — write and delete on a tool that only reads. One steered instruction turns standing privilege into data loss.
Governed by Tokynd Vestibule — MCP scope reviewed like code.
Identity and scope check out, but the action doesn’t match the mission — an unknown tool, an exfiltration domain, a quiet step off the known path.
Governed by Tokynd Pulse and Tokynd Sparring — behavior baselined, then exercised adversarially.
Unlike gateways, scanners, or dashboards, the Tokynd platform works where agents are built. Identity is minted at creation, fixes arrive as merge-ready patches a human approves, and evidence is generated by the fix itself.
Inventory every agent, MCP server, identity, and architecture gap — born at creation where possible, found fast where not.
Merge-ready fix patches a human approves — scope removals, IaC corrections, dependency bumps — never another ticket queue.
Verified rescans close the finding at the source, and every fix emits cross-framework evidence an auditor can follow.
Nine distinct products work as one colleague system. Each pillar has one operational job, one human gate, and one place in the Discover → Fix → Prove loop.
Tokynd Winnow turns scanner noise into one owned queue. Tokynd Pulse learns the deterministic baseline and surfaces deviations without claiming a live sensor.
Tokynd Pair produces the smallest reviewable patch, tests it locally, drafts the PR body, and waits for a human. Opening real repository PRs remains design-partner roadmap.
Tokynd Attavard tiers and maps. Tokynd Birthright creates the identity record. Tokynd Vestibule reviews MCP permissions. Tokynd Sparring exercises adversarial configurations.
Tokynd Dossier packages the approved fix and verified rescan. Tokynd Asbuilt compares architecture intent with deployed descriptors and emits the gap register.
A scanner calls it a permissions problem. An IAM team calls it an identity problem. A SOC calls it an anomaly problem. Each is partly right — and none of them is enough, because an agent’s decision doesn’t stay inside one category.
The kind of the token: owner, scopes, expiry. Tokynd Birthright writes it at creation; Tokynd Vestibule keeps MCP scope honest. On its own, this only says what’s possible — not whether it makes sense.
The behavior against the baseline: the tool path it usually takes, the destinations it usually touches. Tokynd Pulse learns that path and surfaces the deviation with a reason. On its own, this only says something changed — not whether it was allowed.
Tokynd Security assesses both together — the reach and the reason. A kind without behavior is a permission slip. Behavior without a kind is a guess.
No invented customer wall, no anonymous praise, no borrowed certification badge. Tokynd Security earns proof from reproducible artifacts and design partners willing to judge the fix.
One repo, one scanner export, one named security and engineering owner. The pilot is measured on accepted patches and verified closures — not alerts generated.
See the program →Finding → proposed patch → human decision → verification result. Internal merge-rate targets stay labeled as targets until they become measured outcomes.
A public benchmark repo is planned with planted vulnerable and hardened fixtures, deterministic expected outputs, and versioned rules. It is a plan, not a published benchmark today.
v0.4.0. Every status on this page names what runs locally today, what needs a design partner, and what remains roadmap.
Tokynd Security publishes what it learns in the open — methods, fixtures, and findings. The first notes ship as the design-partner program produces them. Nothing here is backdated or borrowed.
How a poisoned tool description steers an agent toward over-scoped tools — and what a least-privilege manifest check catches.
How standing permissions accumulate across agent versions — and what the birth record reveals at review time.
How retrieved context becomes a carrier for instructions — and where the behavior baseline breaks first.
Every product reads from and writes to the Tokynd Assurance Graph. Status badges stay literal: Now · local v0 runs as deterministic local tooling, Design Partner builds with partners, and Roadmap is planned — nothing here is quietly GA.
Tokynd Winnow turns the scanner exports you already have into one reachable, owned queue. Tokynd Pair turns that queue into merge-ready patches with a human gate. When MCP, RAG, identities, and runtime behavior enter the stack, the same graph expands with you — no platform reset.
PR Review & Auto-Fix
Security review that ends in a merge-ready patch, not another ticket. The flagship: a senior security colleague in every pull request that touches agent code, MCP, prompts, or RAG.
MCP Permission Scanner
Every MCP server reviewed like code — tools, permissions, description drift — before it holds production scope.
Agent Identity Provisioning
Identity at creation, not discovered after the incident. Every agent is born with a named owner, scoped tools, an expiry, and a kill switch.
Generated locally in your browser from the v0 record schema (owner · scopes · provenance · kill-switch field). No credential is issued — just-in-time issuance is roadmap. Simulated artifact, not a live identity.
Vulnerability Curation
Five scanners, one weakness, one owner, one fix. Duplicate alerts collapse into a reachable, owned queue developers trust.
AI Governance Fleet
AI governance that produces remediation. The 10-agent Tokynd Attavard fleet: inventory, tier, map, mint, test, remediate, evidence, third-party, drift, audit.
Architecture Drift Scanner
Your diagram is the hypothesis; the API is the evidence. Design-vs-deployed drift across six architecture planes, continuously.
Compliance Evidence Pack
One approved fix testifies four times. Fix + verified rescan become auditor-ready evidence, cross-framework.
Agent Behavior Baselining
Know the normal path. Surface the meaningful deviation. Deterministic behavior baselining for agent tool calls, destinations, and policy decisions.
Adversarial AI Red-Teaming
Exercise the agent configuration before an attacker does. Deterministic probes surface injection paths, poisoned tool descriptions, excessive MCP scope, exfiltration instructions, and missing hygiene controls.
No model is queried and no payload is executed.
Scanners read code. IAM governs people. EDR watches endpoints. Each is doing its job — but none of them sees the agent’s decision, because the decision doesn’t live in any one of their categories.
They find the vulnerable dependency and the misconfigured template. They don’t see the agent choosing which tool to call at 2 a.m.
It governs the people who log in. It doesn’t see the hundred machine identities acting between the logins.
It watches the process tree. It doesn’t see the plan unfolding across the MCP server, the RAG pipeline, and the API.
Tokynd Security doesn’t replace them. It is the neutral fix-and-prove layer across the stack you already own — the decision is governed where the agent is built, the fix arrives as a patch a human approves, and the evidence is generated by the fix itself.
See the platform →No — deliberately. The Tokynd platform ingests findings from Wiz, Prisma Cloud, Orca, Snyk-style SCA, Semgrep/CodeQL, Dependabot, Trivy, and cloud-native scanners; traces each to the code, IaC, agent, and owner; deduplicates them into one owned queue; drafts the PR-ready diff + PR body; and verifies closure back at the source. Keep the scanners and CSPM contracts you trust. Tokynd Security closes the loop they leave open.
Three rules: agents propose and humans approve; every action is scoped by the approved spec and a short-lived identity; and every action is logged to your audit trail and mapped to a control. The Tokynd platform can draft a validated fix diff, tests, risk note, spec check, and PR body. Opening a real PR inside your repo ships with design partners; merging always stays with the human owner under normal branch protection. Agents cannot deploy, widen their own access, or delay revocation.
The spec — capabilities, tools, data access, identity, and guardrails — is written and approved before code is generated. It becomes the contract every later stage checks against: PR review, identity provisioning, testing, and evidence. Security stops being a review at the end and becomes a property of how the system was built.
Starter mappings cover SOC 2, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act, OWASP LLM and MCP Top 10, and CIS Benchmarks. One control is tested once and mapped where it honestly applies; mappings are not certifications or legal determinations. AWS actions are grounded through AWS MCP servers for documentation, IaC validation, pricing, and Bedrock knowledge retrieval; Azure actions use current Microsoft documentation. Recommendations cite real APIs, limits, and service behavior, then tests and rescans validate the proposed fix.
Not yet. Nine products have working local code in v0.4.0; hosted connectors, live runtime sensing, and opening real repository PRs remain design-partner roadmap. A working session starts by inventorying agents, MCP servers, and shadow AI, curating one real queue, and drafting the first merge-ready fixes against your stack. Partners shape the roadmap, get FDE support, and move to launch pricing at GA. Register through Contact below — messages go straight to the Tokynd Security team.
The build focus is AWS and Microsoft Azure, GitHub and GitLab as code systems of record, and Okta and Microsoft Entra ID for identity. Connector depth is phased in the catalog. Customer code, prompts, tool definitions, and data are tenant-isolated and never train models without explicit opt-in; agents work from the minimum artifact needed, and every action is attributable to a human approver and a scoped identity.
Published structure, no invented numbers: Launch bundles platform + services for a first SOC 2 motion, AI-Native is per-developer platform pricing with optional FDE, and Scale is an annual agreement by deployment shape. Final numbers publish at GA; design partners lock launch pricing.
Every non-human identity is a token — a service account, API key, workload credential, MCP server, or AI agent. Each token has a kind: what it is, who owns it, what it may do, and when it expires. Tokynd Security exists to govern agents by kind, and to turn security work into approved fixes with evidence attached.
The logo is the thesis, drawn in three strokes — in security terms.
Hover, focus, or tap a card to isolate its part of the mark.
The credential as an object: a thing that exists, that can be held, copied, and stolen. It is drawn as a ring because a token is only as strong as the boundary around it.
The policy inside the credential. The K sits within the ring the way a kind sits within a token — the classification that decides what the token may do. A ring without the K is just a coin: value with no rules.
Pinned at the junction of the K — the exact center of the token's scope: observed, owned, expiring. Amber, the color of a struck token — an identity under governance, not an alarm.
No shields, no padlocks, no fear. Tokynd governs identity — and a governed identity is a quiet one.
Help AI engineers ship agents secure by construction — and prove it. We put security agents inside the tools developers already use, so the secure path is the normal path: spec, identity, review, fix, verification, and evidence in one thread.
Agent sprawl is outrunning review. Teams are adding IDE agents, MCP servers, RAG pipelines, and model tools faster than security can inventory them — while machine identities already vastly outnumber human ones (sourced on this page). Discovery after the fact is too late; governance has to start at creation.
How we build, and how our agents are allowed to behave.
No agent merges, deploys, widens privilege, or changes cloud state without a human gate. Speed comes from a better proposal, not from removing the approver.
Every fix carries its spec version, tests, source finding, approval, and re-verification. If it cannot be shown, it is not done.
Keep Wiz, Prisma Cloud, Orca, GitHub, GitLab, AWS, and Azure. The Tokynd platform is the neutral fix-and-prove layer across the stack you already own.
Customer code, prompts, and data are not used to train models unless a customer explicitly opts in. Tenant isolation is a product requirement, not a policy footnote.
Design partner, a question about the build, or a working session — one route into Tokynd Security. Messages go directly to the Tokynd Security team, and a human replies.
Founder on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/amjdseyal
We reply to every message personally — usually within one business day.